NonZero Newsletter

NonZero Newsletter

Share this post

NonZero Newsletter
NonZero Newsletter
The AI revolution calls for a foreign policy revolution
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

The AI revolution calls for a foreign policy revolution

A cold war between the two AI superpowers is a recipe for apocalypse

Robert Wright
Jun 07, 2023
∙ Paid
30

Share this post

NonZero Newsletter
NonZero Newsletter
The AI revolution calls for a foreign policy revolution
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
9
Share

This piece (in slightly different form) is also appearing in The Washington Post.  

At last month’s Senate hearing on artificial intelligence, Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, conceded that the technological revolution his company is accelerating has its downsides. Though AI has “the potential to improve nearly every aspect of our lives,” it could also bring socially disruptive changes like job displacement, he said—and “if this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong.” At a conference in January, he’d gone further: “I think the worst case is lights out for all of us.”

If you ask other experts on AI to describe its likely impact, an unsettling number of them come down somewhere on the spectrum defined by Altman’s concerns—somewhere between socially destabilizing and globally catastrophic.

So it’s not surprising that there is serious talk in Washington of regulating AI. But the ideas getting the most attention—such as Altman’s suggestion  that building the most powerful AIs require a federal license—aren’t enough. The AI challenge calls not just for innovative domestic policies but for a basic reorientation of foreign policy—a change comparable in magnitude to the change ushered in by George Kennan’s 1947 “X” article in Foreign Affairs, which argued for a policy of “containing” the Soviet Union. 

But this time the adversary is China, not the USSR, and this time the required redirection is toward engagement, not confrontation. In light of the AI revolution, it is in America’s vital interest to reverse the current slide toward Cold War II and draw China into an international effort to guide technological evolution responsibly.

Share

You don’t have to buy the most catastrophic AI scenarios—like the ones in which AIs gain power and deem humans a disposable nuisance—to believe technology is at a dangerous historical juncture. You can focus instead on the “socially destabilizing” end of the spectrum, and imagine where present trends could lead within a few years. Whatever AI’s eventual benefits (which will be many), it is pretty much guaranteed to: 

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Nonzero
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More